Construction project controls in the GCC: 2026 benchmarks.
How the region's largest EPC and PMC organisations are managing schedule risk, delay claims and executive reporting this year — the data, the gaps, and where the fastest gains are.
Whitepaper · GCC · 2026
Construction Project Controls in the GCC
Schedule risk, delay claims and AI adoption across EPC & PMC — benchmarked for 2026.
OPTEAM Research · 2026 Edition · GCC
What's inside
24 pages14 min readPDF + data
01
The schedule-lag benchmarkHow many days behind site reality the average GCC project schedule runs — and why it's getting worse on mega-projects.
02
Delay claim patterns in KSA & UAEThe most common causes of EOT claims, typical time to resolution and the evidence gaps that sink them.
03
AI adoption by roleWhere planners, PMC consultants and owners are actually using AI today — and the gap between stated intent and active use.
04
The reporting-hours benchmarkHours spent per week on status reporting across project sizes — and the delta between manual and AI-assisted teams.
05
A 90-day improvement playbookWhat to connect first, who to involve, and the metrics that signal the improvement is working.
Download the whitepaper
Free, instant access. We'll email you a copy and the occasional useful read.
Preview
Key findings from the 2026 report.
Schedule lag
6.4d
Average days between site reality and reported schedule across GCC projects.
Reporting hours
14h/wk
Median planner hours spent on status reporting and deck preparation per week.
EOT claims
62%
Of delay claims that are weakened or rejected due to insufficient contemporaneous evidence.